Your practice
You scope the migration with your client, set the price, and decide the cutover window.
Migration capacity Capacité de migration
Margin and billing already names "quoted separately" without ever spelling it out for a specific case. This page does that for migration: moving workloads to Azure, between hypervisors, or off aging hardware — with its own scope, its own inventory, and its own price, distinct from the monthly per-user anchor.
You scope the migration with your client, set the price, and decide the cutover window.
We plan and execute the technical migration path — on-prem to Azure, or server moves between Hyper-V and VMware — and hand back what changed and what still needs validation.
For a client project that involves moving servers or workloads — to Azure, between hypervisors, or off aging hardware — rather than day-to-day administration of a stable environment.
Access to source and target environments, a closed inventory of what’s moving, and your client’s tolerance for downtime during cutover.
What you get: A completed migration checked against the original inventory, with open items named rather than assumed closed.
What we hand back: A migration record: what moved, validation results, and anything still open.
"Quoted separately" only works once the list of what’s moving stops changing mid-project.
Named upfront, not assumed on your side.
Agreed in advance, not improvised during the cutover itself.
Write down where migration finishes and routine administration resumes, so nobody assumes a continuity that was never agreed.
No. This is project work with a start and an end; once validation is complete, the environment returns to the routine administration described on the services page.
That’s a scope conversation, not a silent adjustment. An inventory that grows after the initial price deserves a new quote, not a quiet expansion of the same one.